Case Studies as Natural Experiments
- 1 February 1989
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Human Relations
- Vol. 42 (2) , 117-137
- https://doi.org/10.1177/001872678904200202
Abstract
The paper poses organizational case studies as a provocative way of addressing a long-standing controversy within the social sciences between the subjectivist and objectivist schools of thought. Whereas organizational case studies are customarily conducted as a form of subjectivist research, they may, in addition, be conducted so as to fit the conceptions of objectivist research as well. The paper explains how to achieve this result by conducting case studies as a form of natural experiment. The paper uses organizational case studies in this way to reveal the intersection which exists between the subjectivist and objectivist schools of thought. Organizational case studies which fall in the intersection constitute, in themselves, refutations to the alleged incompatibility between the two schools of thought, and exemplify how a rapprochement can be forged between them. The paper uses an actual organizational case study, Kanter's Men and Women of the Corporation, to illustrate these points.Keywords
This publication has 19 references indexed in Scilit:
- Social Experimentation as Reflection-in-A ctionKnowledge, 1984
- Learning the Craft of Organizational ResearchAcademy of Management Review, 1983
- Multisite/Multimethod StudiesAmerican Behavioral Scientist, 1982
- The Case Study as a Serious Research StrategyKnowledge, 1981
- Alternative Perspectives in the Organizational Sciences: "Inquiry from the inside" and "Inquiry from the outside"Academy of Management Review, 1981
- The Case Study Crisis: Some AnswersAdministrative Science Quarterly, 1981
- The Ethnographic Paradigm(s)Administrative Science Quarterly, 1979
- Using Qualitative Data to Test TheoriesAdministrative Science Quarterly, 1979
- Reforms as experiments.American Psychologist, 1969
- N = 1.Psychological Bulletin, 1965