Comparison of oxyfedrine and atenolol in angina pectoris‐a double‐ blind study.
Open Access
- 1 October 1985
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
- Vol. 20 (4) , 405-410
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2125.1985.tb05085.x
Abstract
We have compared oxyfedrine 24 mg four times daily with atenolol 100 mg once daily in the relief of angina pectoris in a double‐blind cross‐ over study; assessments were by diary cards and treadmill testing. Both oxyfedrine and atenolol reduced the frequency of angina by similar amounts and both produced similar improvements in treadmill performance. Side effects were infrequent and minor with both drugs. The model of action of oxyfedrine appears to be different from atenolol. Oxyfedrine allows the double product of systolic blood pressure X heart rate at peak exercise to be maintained at levels similar to those with placebo; the double product at peak exercise is significantly less with atenolol.This publication has 11 references indexed in Scilit:
- A comparison of once and twice daily atenolol for angina pectorisInternational Journal of Cardiology, 1983
- Comparison of beta‐adrenoceptor blockers under maximal exercise (pindolol v metoprolol v atenolol).British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, 1982
- Possible mechanisms of action of oxyfedrine as an antianginal drug [letter]Published by Wiley ,1981
- Oxyfederine and propranolol-a controlled trial in angina pectoris.Published by Wiley ,1980
- A controlled comparison of oxyfedrine, isosorbide dinitrate and placebo in the treatment of patients suffering attacks of angina pectoris.Published by Wiley ,1980
- Regional myocardial blood flow and segmental wall function after oxyfedrine administration in the ischaemic porcine heartCardiovascular Research, 1980
- The Value of Exercise Stress Testing in Predicting Benefit From Aorto Coronary Bypass SurgeryAngiology, 1979
- THE HAEMODYNAMIC EFFECTS OF PROLONGED ORAL ADMINISTRATION OF OXYFEDRINE, A PARTIAL AGONIST AT β‐ADRENOCEPTORS: COMPARISON WITH PROPRANOLOLBritish Journal of Pharmacology, 1974