Comparisons of body composition derived from anthropometric and bioelectrical impedance methods.

Publisher Website
Google Scholar
Abstract
This study compared bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) measurements with current bedside techniques for determination of body composition in 18 normal volunteers to evaluate the relative usefulness of these methods as adjuncts to assessment in surgical nutrition. Anthropometrics (weight, height, and two skinfold thicknesses) and age and sex were used to derive body density (D) or total body water (TBW) by two methods. Method 1: D was calculated from the logarithm of skinfold thickness according to Durnin and Womersley, adapted for age and sex. Method 2: TBW was calculated from height, weight, and sex according to Hume and Weyers. Resistance and reactance were measured with a four terminal impedance plethysmograph; from these data plus height, weight, and sex, lean body mass (LBM) was derived. In each instance, Siri's and Pace and Rathburn's equations were used to derive the remaining parameters of body composition: D, total body fat (TBF), TBW, and LBM. Using the paired t-test, no statistically significant differences were seen in any parameter determined by the different methods. These results show that D, TBW, TBF, and LBM in a population of healthy individuals under steady-state conditions can be estimated by anthropometric-derived formulas with the same relative accuracy as that provided from estimates based upon BIA measurements.