A Different Method for Steric Field Evaluation in CoMFA Improves Model Robustness
- 1 November 1997
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Chemical Society (ACS) in Journal of Chemical Information and Computer Sciences
- Vol. 37 (6) , 1162-1170
- https://doi.org/10.1021/ci9704221
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 21 references indexed in Scilit:
- Bioisosterism as a Molecular Diversity Descriptor: Steric Fields of Single “Topomeric” ConformersJournal of Medicinal Chemistry, 1996
- Neighborhood Behavior: A Useful Concept for Validation of “Molecular Diversity” DescriptorsJournal of Medicinal Chemistry, 1996
- Van der Waals Intersection Envelope Volumes as a Possible Basis for Steric Interaction in CoMFAQuantitative Structure-Activity Relationships, 1996
- Novel aromatase and 5α-reductase inhibitorsThe Journal of Steroid Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, 1994
- Comparison of the Minimal Steric Difference (MTD) and Comparative Molecular Field Analysis (CoMFA) Methods for Analysis of Binding of Steroids to Carrier ProteinsQuantitative Structure-Activity Relationships, 1993
- Comparative Molecular Field Analysis on a Set of Muscarinic AgonistsQuantitative Structure-Activity Relationships, 1991
- 4-aminoandrostenedione derivatives: A novel class of irreversible aromatase inhibitors. Comparison with FCE 24304 and 4-hydroxyandrostenedioneThe Journal of Steroid Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, 1990
- cis-Diamineplatinum(II) complexes containing phosphono carboxylate ligands as antitumor agentsJournal of Medicinal Chemistry, 1990
- An alternative method for the alignment of molecular structures: Maximizing electrostatic and steric overlapTetrahedron Computer Methodology, 1990
- Comparative molecular field analysis (CoMFA). 2. Toward its use with 3D-structural databasesTetrahedron Computer Methodology, 1990