Induction of Labour for Post Term Pregnancy: An Observational Study
- 1 August 1998
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology
- Vol. 38 (3) , 275-280
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1479-828x.1998.tb03065.x
Abstract
The aim of the study was to compare the 2 management protocols for postterm pregnancy; elective induction of labour at 42 weeks' gestation and continuing the pregnancy with fetal monitoring while awaiting spontaneous labour. A retrospective observational study compared a cohort of 360 pregnancies where labour was induced with 486 controls. All pregnancies were postterm (>294 days) by an early ultrasound scan. Induction of labour was achieved with either prostaglandin vaginal pessaries or gel or forewater rupture and Syntocinon infusion. The control group consisted of women with postterm pregnancies who were not induced routinely and who usually had twice weekly fetal assessment with cardiotocography and/or ultrasound. Women who had their labour induced differed from those who awaited spontaneous labour. Nulliparas (OR 1.54; 95% CI 1.24-1.83) and married women (OR 1.76; 95% CI 1.45-2.06) were more likely to have their labour induced. There was no association between the type of caregiver and induction of labour. Induction of labour was associated with a reduction in the incidence of normal vaginal delivery (OR 0.63, 95% CI 0.43-0.92) and an increased incidence of operative vaginal delivery (OR 1.46; 95% CI 1.34-2.01). There was no difference in the overall rate of Caesarean section. There was no difference in fetal or neonatal outcomes. Parity had a major influence on delivery outcomes from a policy of induction of labour. Nulliparas in the induced group had worse outcomes with only 43% achieving a normal vaginal delivery (OR 0.78, 95% CI 0.65-0.95). In contrast for multiparas, the induced group had better outcomes with less Caesarean sections (OR 0.88, 95% CI 0.81-0.96). This retrospective observational study of current clinical practice shows that induction of labour for postterm pregnancy appears to be favoured by nulliparous married women. It suggests that induction of labour may improve delivery outcomes for multigravas but has an adverse effect for nulliparas.Keywords
This publication has 7 references indexed in Scilit:
- A clinical trial of induction of labor versus expectant management in postterm pregnancyAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1994
- Induction of labour confers benefits in prolonged pregnancyBJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 1994
- Posttenn Pregnancy: New Lessons from an Unresobecl DebateBirth, 1993
- Induction of Labor as Compared with Serial Antenatal Monitoring in Post-Term PregnancyNew England Journal of Medicine, 1992
- The management of prolonged pregnancy—an analysis of women's attitudes before and after termBJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 1991
- International Classification of Diseases: UpdateInternational Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics, 1980
- THE CAUSES AND PREVENTION OF STILLBIRTHS AND FIRST WEEK DEATHSBJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 1954