Meta-analysis of colonic reservoirs versus straight coloanal anastomosis after anterior resection

Publisher Website
Google Scholar
Abstract
Background and methods: The comparative benefits and drawbacks of straight coloanal anastomosis (CAA), colonic ‐pouch and coloplasty anastomosis after anterior resection are uncertain. Studies published between 1986 and 2005 of colonic ‐pouch versus transverse coloplasty or straight CAA were analysed. Endpoints included postoperative complications, and functional and physiological outcomes measured within 6 months, 1 year and 2 years or more after the procedure. A random‐effect model was used to aggregate the study endpoints and assess heterogeneity. Results: Thirty‐five studies containing 2240 patients (1066 straight CAA, 1050 ‐pouch and 124 coloplasty) were included. There was no significant difference in postoperative complications between the three groups. There was a significant reduction in the frequency of defaecation per day by 1·88, 1·35 and 0·74 motions at the three time intervals in the ‐pouch group compared with the straight CAA group. Faecal urgency was less prevalent in patients with a ‐pouch than those with a straight CAA (odds ratio 0·27 at 6 months or less and 0·21 at 1 year). There was no difference in functional outcome between ‐pouch and coloplasty anastomosis. Conclusions: The colonic ‐pouch provided functional benefits over straight anastomosis with no increase in postoperative complications. Coloplasty appeared to have similar benefits but further studies are required for validation. Copyright © 2005 British Journal of Surgery Society Ltd. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd