Advancing the analysis of treatment process
- 4 July 2007
- Vol. 102 (10) , 1539-1545
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1360-0443.2007.01880.x
Abstract
Aims To review the role of process research in clinical research, to summarize progress in statistical methods for process analyses, and to describe a dynamic analytical approach that can provide new insights into the processes responsible for the effects of treatments and other variables.Summary Process research helps us to understand what happens during our interventions, and can yield valuable knowledge regardless of whether an intervention is found to have significant effects. This is a review of recent statistical advances for dealing with missing data, tests for mediation and hierarchical modeling and demonstrate how these advances can help process researchers overcome obstacles that had limited past studies. However, the standard paradigm for process analysis, although conceptually sound, is based upon a static model that does little justice to the dynamics of treatment. Therefore, it is proposed that the paradigm is extended to study the time–course of dynamic processes, using existing statistical methods. Hierarchical linear modeling, structural regression modeling and event history methods are among the most promising tools for more advanced process analyses because of their ability to incorporate time‐varying predictors.Conclusions The function of process analysis is to probe into the mechanisms of action of treatment to locate both weaknesses and strengths, but methods for process research are still rudimentary. By conceptualizing process analysis as a problem of relating multiple time‐series, many new analytical opportunities, and challenges, present themselves. Modern statistical methods can help to lead to broad advances in our understanding of the processes that affect treatment success.Keywords
This publication has 36 references indexed in Scilit:
- Estimating the effect of help‐seeking on achieving recovery from alcohol dependenceAddiction, 2006
- A Latent Markov Model for the Analysis of Longitudinal Data Collected in Continuous Time: States, Durations, and Transitions.Psychological Methods, 2005
- Two-Year Stability and Change of Schizotypal, Borderline, Avoidant, and Obsessive-Compulsive Personality Disorders.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 2004
- Testing Mediational Models With Longitudinal Data: Questions and Tips in the Use of Structural Equation Modeling.Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 2003
- A comparison of methods to test mediation and other intervening variable effects.Psychological Methods, 2002
- Toward a stepped care approach to treating problem drinkers: the predictive utility of within‐treatment variables and therapist prognostic ratingsAddiction, 1997
- Hierarchical Linear Models for Multivariate OutcomesJournal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 1997
- Progression from a smoking lapse to relapse: Prediction from abstinence violation effects, nicotine dependence, and lapse characteristics.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1996
- The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1986
- Use of structural analysis of social behavior (SASB) and Markov chains to study dyadic interactions.Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 1979