Lumpy Capacity Investment and Disinvestment Dynamics
- 1 August 2010
- journal article
- Published by Institute for Operations Research and the Management Sciences (INFORMS) in Operations Research
- Vol. 58 (4-part-2) , 1178-1193
- https://doi.org/10.1287/opre.1100.0823
Abstract
Capacity addition and withdrawal decisions are among the most important strategic decisions made by firms in oligopolistic industries. In this paper, we develop and analyze a fully dynamic model of an oligopolistic industry with lumpy capacity and lumpy investment/disinvestment. We use our model to suggest answers to two questions: First, what economic factors facilitate preemption races? Second, what economic factors facilitate capacity coordination? With a series of examples we show that low product differentiation, low investment sunkness, and high depreciation tend to promote preemption races. The same examples also show that low product differentiation and low investment sunkness tend to promote capacity coordination. Although depreciation removes capacity, it might impede capacity coordination. Finally, our examples show that multiple equilibria arise over at least some range of parameter values. The distinct structures of these equilibria suggest that firms' expectations play a key role in determining whether or not industry dynamics are characterized by preemption races and capacity coordination. Taken together, our results suggest that preemption races and excess capacity in the short run often go hand-in-hand with capacity coordination in the long run.Keywords
All Related Versions
This publication has 21 references indexed in Scilit:
- A User's Guide to Solving Dynamic Stochastic Games Using the Homotopy MethodOperations Research, 2010
- Learning-by-Doing, Organizational Forgetting, and Industry DynamicsEconometrica, 2010
- Capacity Dynamics and Endogenous Asymmetries in Firm SizeThe RAND Journal of Economics, 2004
- Capacity constraints, mergers and collusionEuropean Economic Review, 2002
- Capacity precommitment as a barrier to entry: A Bertrand-Edgeworth approachEconomic Theory, 2000
- Explaining Investment Dynamics in U.S. Manufacturing: A Generalized (S, s) ApproachEconometrica, 1999
- Cheap Talk and Investment Rivalry in the Pulp and Paper IndustryJournal of Industrial Economics, 1997
- Bertrand-Edgeworth duopoly with unit cost asymmetryEconomic Theory, 1996
- Price margins and capital adjustment: Canadian mill products and pulp and paper industriesInternational Journal of Industrial Organization, 1992
- Price Setting Supergames with Capacity ConstraintsThe Review of Economic Studies, 1985