Comparison of autofocus methods for automated microscopy
- 1 January 1991
- Vol. 12 (3) , 195-206
- https://doi.org/10.1002/cyto.990120302
Abstract
Traditional autofocus methods were designed for microscopes driven by single processor computers. As computers are developed that exploit massive parallelism when acquiring and analyzing images, parallel cellular logic techniques became available to focus automatically. This paper introduces the reader to both cellular logic techniques for autofocus and a new spectral moment autofocus measure. It then compares these methods with more traditional autofocus methods. It is shown that traditional methods based on measurements of image power‐give the best results when tested on one set of real images and two sets of synthetic images. The next best methods are the cellular logic and spectral moment techniques, while the worst are those based on the image probability density function or histogram.Keywords
This publication has 12 references indexed in Scilit:
- A comparison of different focus functions for use in autofocus algorithmsCytometry, 1985
- Comparison of digital focus criteria for a TV microscope systemCytometry, 1984
- Modern Cellular AutomataPublished by Springer Nature ,1984
- Depth of convergence of a sharpness index autofocus systemApplied Optics, 1977
- Sharpness index and its application to focus controlApplied Optics, 1976
- An automated microscope for cytologic research a preliminary evaluation.Journal of Histochemistry & Cytochemistry, 1976
- METAPHASE SPREAD DETECTION AND FOCUS USING CLOSED CIRCUIT TELEVISIONJournal of Histochemistry & Cytochemistry, 1974
- Automatic Analysis of Blood CellsScientific American, 1970
- Hexagonal Parallel Pattern TransformationsIEEE Transactions on Computers, 1969
- A Mathematical Theory of CommunicationBell System Technical Journal, 1948