Research and policy: What determines the relationship?
- 1 March 1996
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Policy Studies
- Vol. 17 (1) , 23-34
- https://doi.org/10.1080/01442879608423691
Abstract
The relationship between research and policy is a matter of much current interest to policy makers in health. This paper uses historical approaches and case studies to examine the nature of the interrelationship. Drug policy (the evaluation of methadone maintenance in the 1970s and of needle exchange in the 1980s) and alcohol policy (the changing fortunes of the Ledermann hypothesis relating total alcohol consumption to population based harm) provide examples of how the relationship operates. Research can provide the legitimation for particular policy alliances; the role of medical civil servants and medical experts in the UK has historically played a crucial gatekeeping’ role.Keywords
This publication has 22 references indexed in Scilit:
- Ideology, history and changing models of liver cirrhosis epidemiologyBritish Journal of Addiction, 1992
- Toward Better Theories of the Policy ProcessPS: Political Science and Politics, 1991
- AcknowledgementsBritish Journal of Addiction, 1990
- Health Policy and the Politics of Research in the United StatesJournal of Health Politics, Policy and Law, 1990
- A Comment on the ‘Syringe Exchange Schemes Final Report’British Journal of Addiction, 1989
- Science is in the details: Towards a nuanced view of alcohol control studiesJournal of Substance Abuse, 1988
- Alcohol control policies and drinking patterns: An international game of politics against scienceJournal of Substance Abuse, 1988
- Quasi-science and public policy: A reply to robin room about details and misrepresentations in scienceJournal of Substance Abuse, 1988
- Self‐Reported Drinking Habits and Alcohol‐Related Consequences Amongst a Cohort of Scottish TeenagersBritish Journal of Addiction, 1982
- The Association Between per capita Consumption of Alcohol and the Proportion of Excessive Consumers – A reply to SkogBritish Journal of Addiction, 1980