Response Time Effectiveness:Comparison of Response Time and Survival in an Urban Emergency Medical Services System
- 1 April 2002
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in Academic Emergency Medicine
- Vol. 9 (4) , 288-295
- https://doi.org/10.1197/aemj.9.4.288
Abstract
Emergency medical services (EMS) administrators seek methods to enhance system performance. One component scrutinized is the response time (RT) interval between call receipt and arrival on scene. While reducing RTs may improve survival, this remains speculative and unreported. Objective: To determine the effect of current RTs on survival in an urban EMS system. Methods: The study was conducted in a metropolitan county (population 620,000). The EMS system is a single‐tier, paramedic service and provides all service requests. The 90% fractile RT specifications required for county compliance include 10:59 minutes for emergency life‐threatening calls (priority I) and 12:59 minutes for emergency non‐life‐threatening calls (priority II). All emergency responses resulting in a priority I or priority II transport to a Level 1 trauma center emergency department over a six‐month period were evaluated to determine the relation between specified and arbitrarily assigned RTs and survival. Results: Five thousand, four hundred twenty‐four transports were reviewed. Of these, 71 patients did not survive (1.31%; 95% CI = 1.04% to 1.67%). No significant difference in median RTs between survivors (6.4 min) and nonsurvivors (6.8 min) was noted (p = 0.10). Further, there was no significant difference between observed and expected deaths (p = 0.14). However, mortality risk was 1.58% for patients whose RT exceeded 5 minutes, and 0.51% for those whose RT was under 5 minutes (p = 0.002). The mortality risk curve was generally flat over RT intervals exceeding 5 minutes. Conclusions: In this observational study, emergency calls where RTs were less than 5 minutes were associated with improved survival when compared with calls where RTs exceeded 5 minutes. While variables other than time may be associated with this improved survival, there is little evidence in these data to suggest that changing this system's response time specifications to times less than current, but greater than 5 minutes, would have any beneficial effect on survival.This publication has 21 references indexed in Scilit:
- Effectiveness of Emergency Medical Services for Victims of Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest: A MetaanalysisAnnals of Emergency Medicine, 1996
- Five‐Hundred Life‐Saving Interventions and Their Cost‐EffectivenessRisk Analysis, 1995
- The emergent problem of ambulance misuseAnnals of Emergency Medicine, 1993
- Prospective validation of a new model for evaluating emergency medical services systems by in-field observation of specific time intervals in prehospital careAnnals of Emergency Medicine, 1993
- EMS system performance: The use of cardiac arrest timelinesAnnals of Emergency Medicine, 1993
- Recommended guidelines for uniform reporting of data from out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: The utstein styleAnnals of Emergency Medicine, 1991
- Prehospital advanced trauma life support for penetrating cardiac woundsAnnals of Emergency Medicine, 1990
- The Importance of Prompt Transport in Salvage of Patients with Penetrating Heart WoundsPublished by Wolters Kluwer Health ,1982
- Robust Locally Weighted Regression and Smoothing ScatterplotsJournal of the American Statistical Association, 1979