The English school of international relations: a reply to Sheila Grader
- 1 January 1989
- journal article
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in Review of International Studies
- Vol. 15 (1) , 49-58
- https://doi.org/10.1017/s0260210500113087
Abstract
There is increasing acceptance among International Relations scholars that there is a group of writers which should be recognized as constituting a distinct school of thought. More often than not this school is called, following Roy E. Jones, the ‘English school’. However, acceptance of such a school is often accompanied by disagreement and confusion as to its definitive or unifying characteristics. In the January 1988 issue of thisReview, Dr Sheila Grader directly confronted this disagreement and confusion by rejecting wholesale the assertion that there is an English school. However, her own assertions and arguments fail to convince. Indeed they serve to cast the matter into deeper obfuscation.Keywords
This publication has 7 references indexed in Scilit:
- Nonintervention and International OrderPublished by Walter de Gruyter GmbH ,2015
- The English school of international relations: evidence and evaluationReview of International Studies, 1988
- An anatomy of international thoughtReview of International Studies, 1987
- The Structure of Institutionalism: an Anatomy of British Mainstream International RelationsInternational Relations, 1983
- The English school of international relations: a case for closureReview of International Studies, 1981
- The Anarchical SocietyPublished by Springer Nature ,1977
- Transnationalism : The American IllusionMillennium: Journal of International Studies, 1976