Immunization Levels and Risk Factors for Low Immunization Coverage Among Private Practices
- 1 June 2000
- journal article
- Published by American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) in Pediatrics
- Vol. 105 (6) , e73
- https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.105.6.e73
Abstract
Objectives. Previous studies have indicated that provider characteristics are an important determinant of immunization coverage. The objectives of this study were to: 1) assess immunization coverage levels among 2-year-old children receiving care in private practices in 3 California counties; and 2) evaluate practice and patient risk factors for low immunization coverage. Study Design. Cross-sectional chart review of immunization histories and provider survey of immunization policies. Setting. Forty-five randomly selected, private medical practices in 3 counties in California. Patients. Children 12 to 35 months old, followed by the participating practices. Methods. Providers underwent a detailed assessment of their immunization coverage and completed a questionnaire describing their immunization policies and procedures. Immunization data were abstracted from randomly selected medical charts of children 12 to 35 months old. Only patients who met the criteria for active status (≥2 visits and ≥1 visit during the preceding 18 months) were included in analyses. Immunization coverage levels were calculated and logistic regression was used to estimate the risk of underimmunization associated with different practice and child characteristics. Results. Of the 72 eligible practices that were contacted, 45 participated in the study, yielding a participation rate of 62%. The median immunization coverage of participating offices was 54% (range: 0%–91%). Multivariate analysis revealed 5 independent risk factors for underimmunization. The strongest predictors were having fewer than 50% active children in the practice and children having fewer than 8 visits to the provider. Other significant predictors were the percentage of patients in the practice on Medicaid, administering diphtheria-tetanus-pertussis 4 at a separate visit from the Haemophilus influenzae type b booster, and practice location. Conclusions. These data provide new insights into immunization practices in an important clinical setting that has been poorly characterized previously. Immunization coverage levels were found to be low and significant risk factors for underimmunization were identified. Recommendations are made for immunization policy changes and targeting of immunization improvement interventions at practices that may be at risk for low immunization coverage. immunization, vaccination, immunization programs, primary prevention, private practice, child, preschool, pediatrics, family practice.Keywords
This publication has 8 references indexed in Scilit:
- Are Immunizations an Incentive for Well-Child Visits?Archives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine, 1997
- Methodological Issues in Determining Rates of Childhood Immunization in Office PracticeArchives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine, 1996
- Calculating a clinic's childhood immunization rate. Costs and returnsArchives of Family Medicine, 1995
- Development of a vaccine tracking system to improve the rate of age-appropriate primary immunization in children of lower socioeconomic statusThe Journal of Pediatrics, 1995
- A Randomized Trial of the Effectiveness of Computer-Generated Telephone Messages in Increasing Immunization Visits Among Preschool ChildrenArchives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine, 1994
- Delays in Childhood Immunizations in Public and Private SettingsArchives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine, 1994
- Immunization Practices of Primary Care Practitioners and Their Relation to Immunization LevelsArchives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine, 1994
- The Measles EpidemicJAMA, 1991