Recent trends in the use of radical prostatectomy in England: the epidemiology of diffusion
Open Access
- 1 March 2003
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in BJU International
- Vol. 91 (4) , 331-336
- https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1464-410x.2003.04083.x
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To describe recent trends in the use of radical prostatectomy (RP) in England, as there is currently no consensus on the most effective treatment for localized prostate cancer, although RP is the treatment of choice among urological surgeons for men aged < 70 years. METHODS Routine data were assessed to establish the number of RPs performed in England in 1991–99. Age-standardized operation rates were compared by region and socio-economic group, and the geographical spread of use mapped. RESULTS The number of RPs performed annually increased nearly 20-fold between 1991 and 1999. Rates of surgery were greatest in the London National Health Service (NHS) regions and lowest in the Trent region. Outside London, the risk of surgery in a NHS hospital was significantly greater for men living in the least deprived areas; in London this trend was reversed. CONCLUSION Rapid increases in the use of RP showed marked regional variations, most likely related to access to prostate-specific antigen testing and the location of surgeons able to carry out radical surgery. By 1999, a third of procedures were still being undertaken in ‘low-volume’ hospitals, with implications for the quality of care and outcomes. Crucially, these developments occurred in the absence of robust information about the effectiveness of RP. Recent funding of a randomized trial of treatment options in this area is welcome, but wider questions remain about the timing of the evaluation of surgical technologies.Keywords
This publication has 18 references indexed in Scilit:
- Quality improvement report Improving design and conduct of randomised trials by embedding them in qualitative research: ProtecT (prostate testing for cancer and treatment) study Commentary: presenting unbiased information to patients can be difficultBMJ, 2002
- A Randomized Trial Comparing Radical Prostatectomy with Watchful Waiting in Early Prostate CancerNew England Journal of Medicine, 2002
- Survey of the rate of PSA testing in general practiceBritish Journal of Cancer, 2001
- International trends in prostate-cancer mortality in the ?PSA era?International Journal of Cancer, 2001
- Comparison of Recommendations by Urologists and Radiation Oncologists for Treatment of Clinically Localized Prostate CancerJAMA, 2000
- Rising incidence of prostate cancer in Scotland: increased risk or increased detection?BJU International, 2000
- When Is the ‘right’ Time to Initiate an Assessment of a Health TechnologyInternational Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care, 1998
- Use of Radical Prostatectomy Among Medicare Beneficiaries Before and After the Introduction of Prostate Specific Antigen TestingJournal of Urology, 1997
- A structured literature review of treatment for localized prostate cancer. Prostate Disease Patient Outcome Research TeamArchives of Family Medicine, 1993