Differential diagnostic value of procalcitonin in surgical and medical patients with septic shock
- 1 January 2006
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Critical Care Medicine
- Vol. 34 (1) , 102-107
- https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ccm.0000195012.54682.f3
Abstract
To assess whether different diagnostic and prognostic cutoff values of procalcitonin should be considered in surgical and in medical patients with septic shock. Prospective observational study. Intensive care unit of the Avicenne teaching hospital, France. All patients with septic shock or noninfectious systemic inflammatory response syndrome within 48 hrs after admission. None. Patients were allocated to one of the following groups: group 1 (surgical patients with septic shock), group 2 (surgical patients with noninfectious systemic inflammatory response syndrome), group 3 (medical patients with septic shock), and group 4 (medical patients with noninfectious systemic inflammatory response syndrome). Procalcitonin at study entry was compared between group 1 and group 2 and between group 3 and group 4 to determine the diagnostic cutoff value in surgical and in medical patients, respectively. Procalcitonin was compared between survivors and nonsurvivors from group 1 and group 3 to determine its prognostic cutoff value. One hundred forty-three patients were included: 31 in group 1, 36 in group 2, 36 in group 3, and 40 in group 4. Median procalcitonin levels (ng/mL [interquartile range]) were higher in group 1 than in group 3 (34.00 [7.10–76.00] vs. 8.40 [3.63–24.70], p = .01). In surgical patients, the best diagnostic cutoff value was 9.70 ng/mL, with 91.7% sensitivity and 74.2% specificity. In medical patients, the best diagnostic cutoff value was 1.00 ng/mL, with 80% sensitivity and 94% specificity. Procalcitonin was a reliable early prognostic marker in medical but not in surgical patients with septic shock. A cutoff value of 6.00 ng/mL had 76% sensitivity and 72.7% specificity for separating survivors from nonsurvivors. The diagnostic cutoff value of procalcitonin was higher in surgical than in medical patients. Early procalcitonin was of prognostic interest in medical patients.Keywords
This publication has 19 references indexed in Scilit:
- Serum Procalcitonin and C-Reactive Protein Levels as Markers of Bacterial Infection: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysisClinical Infectious Diseases, 2004
- Procalcitonin is a Valuable Prognostic Marker in Cardiac Surgery but not Specific for InfectionThe Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgeon, 2003
- Perioperative Serum Procalcitonin Concentrations in Patients with Acute Aortic DissectionEuropean Surgical Research, 2003
- Can procalcitonin measurement help in differentiating between bacterial infection and other kinds of inflammatory processes?Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases, 2003
- Procalcitonin: a useful discriminator between febrile conditions of different origin in hemato-oncological patients?Annals of Hematology, 2003
- Outcome Prediction by Traditional and New Markers of Inflammation in Patients with Sepsiscclm, 1999
- Procalcitonin as a marker of severity in septic shockLangenbecks Archives Of Surgery, 1999
- Postoperative plasma concentrations of procalcitonin after different types of surgeryIntensive Care Medicine, 1998
- HYPERCALCITONINAEMIA IN FULMINANT MENINGOCOCCAEMIA IN CHILDRENThe Lancet, 1983
- HYPERCALCITONINEMIA IN ACUTE PANCREATITISJournal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism, 1975