Memory Constraints and Flower Choice in Pieris rapae
- 16 May 1986
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) in Science
- Vol. 232 (4752) , 863-865
- https://doi.org/10.1126/science.232.4752.863
Abstract
Darwin hypothesized that flower constancy in insects that feed on nectar results from the need to learn how to extract nectar from a flower of a given species. In laboratory tests, Pieris rapae , the cabbage butterfly, showed flower constancy by continuing to visit flower species with which it had experience. The time required by individuals to find the source of nectar in flowers decreased with successive attempts, the performance following a learning curve. Learning to extract nectar from a second species interfered with the ability to extract nectar from the first. Insects that switch species thus experience a cost in time to learn. These results support recent suggestions on the importance of learning in animal foraging.This publication has 18 references indexed in Scilit:
- How Bees Remember Flower ShapesScience, 1985
- Associative learning in the ovipositional behaviour of the cabbage butterfly, Pieris rapaePhysiological Entomology, 1984
- Optimal Foraging Theory and the Psychology of LearningAmerican Zoologist, 1983
- Floral preferences of bumblebees (Bombus edwardsii) in relation to intermittent versus continuous rewardsAnimal Behaviour, 1981
- The flower-visiting behaviour of bumble bees: floral complexity and learningCanadian Journal of Zoology, 1980
- Behavioural access to short-term memory in beesNature, 1979
- "Majoring" and "Minoring" by Foraging Bumblebees, Bombus Vagans: An Experimental AnalysisEcology, 1979
- Why Do Bumblebees Major? A Mathematical ModelEcological Monographs, 1976
- The Foraging Specializations of Individual BumblebeesEcological Monographs, 1976
- The taxonomic discrimination of beesHeredity, 1951