Designs for evaluating the validity and accuracy of performance ratings
- 31 August 1987
- journal article
- Published by Elsevier in Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes
- Vol. 40 (1) , 1-21
- https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(87)90002-1
Abstract
No abstract availableThis publication has 31 references indexed in Scilit:
- IMPLICATIONS OF PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL LITIGATION FOR PERSONNEL ECISIONSPersonnel Psychology, 1981
- Effects of rater training: Creating new response sets and decreasing accuracy.Journal of Applied Psychology, 1980
- Format and training effects on rating accuracy and rater errors.Journal of Applied Psychology, 1979
- Individual Differences Correlates of Accuracy in Evaluating Others' Performance EffectivenessApplied Psychological Measurement, 1979
- Exploring upper limits of reliability and validity in job performance ratings.Journal of Applied Psychology, 1978
- Consistency of rating accuracy and rating errors in the judgment of human performanceOrganizational Behavior and Human Performance, 1977
- Behavior-based versus trait-oriented performance ratings: An empirical study.Journal of Applied Psychology, 1975
- An empirical comparison of the relative effects of rater response biases on three rating scale formats.Journal of Applied Psychology, 1974
- Alternative Methods of Analysis: Multitrait-Multimethod DataEducational and Psychological Measurement, 1970
- Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix.Psychological Bulletin, 1959