It's not easy being interdisciplinary
Open Access
- 19 September 2006
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in International Journal of Epidemiology
- Vol. 35 (5) , 1119-1122
- https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/dyl200
Abstract
It is no surprise that in a world dominated by business models and bottom lines that talk of interdisciplinarity is on the rise in science, as we are increasingly encouraged to be innovative through collaboration that ‘leverages’, ‘exploits’, and ‘optimizes’ resources. If you have not already heard these words around your workplace, you probably soon will. In fact, interdisciplinarity is now being studied as a scientific phenomenon in its own right1 as scientists and organizations struggle to figure out how to be—well, interdisciplinary.Keywords
This publication has 13 references indexed in Scilit:
- The population dynamics of cancer: a Darwinian perspectiveInternational Journal of Epidemiology, 2006
- Decomposing socioeconomic inequality in infant mortality in IranInternational Journal of Epidemiology, 2006
- Child mortality and cohort lifespan: a test of diminished entelechyInternational Journal of Epidemiology, 2006
- Revisiting Lessons from the FieldPublished by WHO Press ,2006
- Translational and Clinical Science — Time for a New VisionNew England Journal of Medicine, 2005
- Genetic epidemiology and public health: hope, hype, and future prospectsThe Lancet, 2005
- Collaborative Research Across Disciplinary and Organizational BoundariesSocial Studies of Science, 2005
- On decomposing the causes of health sector inequalities with an application to malnutrition inequalities in VietnamJournal of Econometrics, 2003
- MEDICAL ANTHROPOLOGY AND EPIDEMIOLOGYAnnual Review of Anthropology, 1996
- Male-Female Wage Differentials in Urban Labor MarketsInternational Economic Review, 1973