Exploring dimensionality in the origins of hazard-related trust
- 1 October 1999
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Journal of Risk Research
- Vol. 2 (4) , 325-354
- https://doi.org/10.1080/136698799376763
Abstract
Linked to the belief that trust affects public responses to hazard management is the question of reasons for this trust or distrust. The scanty research on this topic is poorly designed and tends not to examine the rationales of citizens themselves. A classification of potential reasons under the rubrics of 'competence,' 'care' and 'consensual values' points up the strengths, limitations, and inconsistencies in suggested explanations, and raises the question of whether trust is one- or multidimensional. This discussion aims to provide a foundation for better specification of terms and hypotheses in designing research on trust and its constituents.Keywords
This publication has 31 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Problem of TrustContemporary Sociology: A Journal of Reviews, 1998
- On‐Site Storage of High Level Nuclear Waste: Attitudes and Perceptions of Local ResidentsRisk Analysis, 1996
- Agency Communication, Community Outrage, and Perception of Risk: Three Simulation ExperimentsRisk Analysis, 1993
- Workers′ Evaluations of the "Ends" and the "Means": An Examination of Four Models of Distributive and Procedural JusticeOrganizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 1993
- Cultural TheoryAnthropologica, 1992
- In Search of the Machiavellian Milquetoasts: Comparing Attitudes of Bureaucrats and Ordinary PeoplePublic Administration Review, 1990
- Judgments of policies designed to elicit local cooperation on llrw disposal siting: Comparing the public and decision makersNuclear and Chemical Waste Management, 1987
- The Everyday Versus the Disaster Role of Local OfficialsUrban Affairs Quarterly, 1981
- Political Language: Words that Succeed and Policies that Fail.Contemporary Sociology: A Journal of Reviews, 1978
- The Study of Behavior: Q-Technique and Its Methodology.Journal of the American Statistical Association, 1955