Pertussis in Adolescents and Adults: Should We Vaccinate?
- 1 June 2005
- journal article
- Published by American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP)
- Vol. 115 (6) , 1675-1684
- https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2004-2509
Abstract
Background. The incidence of reported pertussis among adolescents, adults, and young infants has increased sharply over the past decade. Combined acellular pertussis vaccines for adolescents and adults are available in Canada, Australia, and Germany and may soon be considered for use in the United States. Objective. To evaluate the potential health benefits, risks, and costs of a national pertussis vaccination program for adolescents and/or adults. Design, Setting, and Population. The projected health states and immunity levels associated with pertussis disease and vaccination were simulated with a Markov model. The following strategies were examined from the health care payer and societal perspectives: (1) no vaccination; (2) 1-time adolescent vaccination; (3) 1-time adult vaccination; (4) adult vaccination with boosters; (5) adolescent and adult vaccination with boosters; and (6) postpartum vaccination. Data on disease incidence, costs, outcomes, vaccine efficacy, and adverse events were based on published studies, recent unpublished clinical trials, and expert panel input. Main Outcome Measures. Cases prevented, adverse events, costs (in 2004 US dollars), cost per case prevented, and cost per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) saved. Results. One-time adolescent vaccination would prevent 30800 cases of pertussis (36% of projected cases) and would result in 91000 vaccine adverse events (67% local reactions). If pertussis vaccination cost $15 and vaccine coverage was 76%, then 1-time adolescent vaccination would cost $1100 per case prevented (or $1200 per case prevented) or $20000 per QALY (or $23000 per QALY) saved, from the societal (or health care payer) perspective. With a threshold of $50000 per QALY saved, the adolescent and adult vaccination with boosters strategy became potentially cost-effective from the societal perspective only if 2 conditions were met simultaneously, ie, (1) the disease incidence for adolescents and adults was ≥6 times higher than base-case assumptions and (2) the cost of vaccination was less than $10. Adult vaccination strategies were more costly and less effective than adolescent vaccination strategies. The results were sensitive to assumptions about disease incidence, vaccine efficacy, frequency of vaccine adverse events, and vaccine costs. Conclusions. Routine pertussis vaccination of adolescents results in net health benefits and may be relatively cost-effective.Keywords
This publication has 64 references indexed in Scilit:
- Adolescent and adult pertussis vaccination: computer simulations of five new strategiesVaccine, 2004
- Evaluation of Strategies for Use of Acellular Pertussis Vaccine in Adolescents and Adults: A Cost-Benefit AnalysisClinical Infectious Diseases, 2004
- An Economic Analysis of the Current Universal 2-dose measles-mumps-rubella Vaccination Program in the United StatesThe Journal of Infectious Diseases, 2004
- Retrospective population-based assessment of medically attended injection site reactions, seizures, allergic responses and febrile episodes after acellular pertussis vaccine combined with diphtheria and tetanus toxoidsThe Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal, 2002
- Recommendations are needed for adolescent and adult pertussis immunisation: rationale and strategies for considerationVaccine, 2001
- The Increasing Incidence of Pertussis in Massachusetts Adolescents and Adults, 1989–1998The Journal of Infectious Diseases, 2000
- A randomised controlled trial with a diphtheria–tetanus–acellular pertussis (dTpa) vaccine in adultsVaccine, 2000
- Symptoms and complications of pertussis in adultsInfection, 1995
- Cost utility analysis: What should be measured?Social Science & Medicine, 1994
- Intrafamilial spread of pertussisThe Journal of Pediatrics, 1983