Design of clinical trials for chronic diseases: implications for periodontal disease
- 1 May 1986
- journal article
- clinical trial
- Published by Wiley in Journal of Clinical Periodontology
- Vol. 13 (5) , 411-414
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051x.1986.tb01484.x
Abstract
In order to make effective use of the statistical theory of design of clinical trials for chronic diseases such as periodontal disease, certain issues must be considered. Any clinical trial requires that the disease definition be well-specified; that patient eligibility be explicit; that the observation times be explicit; that the duration and endpoint of therapy be specified; that the duration of subsequent followup observation be specified; and that the unit of observation (e.g., tooth, set of teeth, patient) be defined. In a chronic disease, the potential biases that can readily be introduced by self-selection of patients who enter the trial and/or who return for subsequent observation become more important, because subjects are required to remain on treatment and/or observation for prolonged periods. Further, the cyclical nature of some chronic diseases may require special attention to baseline definitions of active disease and disease outcome. These issues are illustrated with examples from clinical trials of hypertension, breast cancer screening, and Polycythemia Vera. Implications for periodontal disease are discussed.Keywords
This publication has 2 references indexed in Scilit:
- Study designs for evaluating antihypertensive drugs as both single and supplemental agentsControlled Clinical Trials, 1985
- Increased Incidence of Acute Leukemia in Polycythemia Vera Associated with Chlorambucil TherapyNew England Journal of Medicine, 1981