DEVELOPMENTAL CHANGES IN HOW CHILDREN UNDERSTAND TELEVISION
- 1 January 1982
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Scientific Journal Publishers Ltd in Social Behavior and Personality: an international journal
- Vol. 10 (2) , 133-144
- https://doi.org/10.2224/sbp.1982.10.2.133
Abstract
The purpose of the present research was to study how children under stand scenes of social interaction that are portrayed on television and how their understanding changes as a function of age and cognitive development. Measures were obtained from children's spontaneous reconstructions of television scenes and also from their responses to a series of specific questions regarding the thoughts and feelings of particular television characters. It was found that younger and less cognitively mature viewers were more likely to structure televised social content in terms of overt descriptive features, action, and literal repetition of dialogue. Older children and adolescents were more likely to consider the inferential aspects of social interaction and to offer interpretations based on people's psychological qualities.This publication has 12 references indexed in Scilit:
- The child's demystification of psychological defense mechanisms: A structural and developmental analysis.Developmental Psychology, 1978
- Development of recursive and nonrecursive thinking about persons.Developmental Psychology, 1978
- Social CognitionPublished by Springer Nature ,1977
- A Structural-Developmental Analysis of Levels of Role Taking in Middle ChildhoodChild Development, 1974
- Observational Learning of Motives and Consequences for Television Aggression: A Developmental StudyChild Development, 1974
- STRUCTURAL-DEVELOPMENTAL ANALYSIS OF LEVELS OF ROLE TAKING IN MIDDLE CHILDHOOD1974
- Effect of temporal separation between motivation, aggression, and consequences: A developmental study.Developmental Psychology, 1973
- Developmental analysis of interpersonal behavior.Psychological Review, 1970
- The developmental psychology of Jean Piaget.Published by American Psychological Association (APA) ,1963