ENDOTHELIUM‐DERIVED HYPERPOLARIZING FACTOR(S): SPECIES AND TISSUE HETEROGENEITY

Publisher Website
Google Scholar
Abstract
1. Endothelium-derived relaxing factor is almost universally considered to be synonymous with nitric oxide (NO); however, it is now well established that at least two other chemically distinct species (prostacyclin (PGI2) and a hyperpolarizing factor) may also contribute to endothelium-dependent relaxation. 2. Only relatively few studies have provided definitive evidence that an endothelium-derived hyperpolarizing factor (EDHF), which is neither NO nor PGI2, exists as a chemical mediator. 3. There is a lack of agreement as to the likely chemical identity of this putative factor. Some evidence suggests that EDHF may be a cytochrome P450-derived arachidonic acid product, possibly an epoxyeicosatrienoic acid (EET); conflicting evidence supports an endogenous cannabinoid as the mediator and still other studies infer an unknown mediator that is neither a cytochrome P450 nor a cannabinoid. 4. Data from our laboratory with a rabbit carotid artery ‘sandwich’ preparation have provided evidence that a mediator that meets the pharmacological expectations of a cytochrome P450 product is an EDHF. 5. Data from guinea-pig mesenteric arterioles suggest that EDHF is not a cytochrome P450 product, whereas in guinea-pig middle cerebral arteries, relaxation mediated by the NO/PGI2-independent mediator(s) is sensitive to cytochrome P450 inhibitors. In addition, in the rabbit middle cerebral artery, it is likely that endothelium-dependent hyperpolarization is mediated by both NO and PGI2. 6. In conclusion, these data indicate that EDHF is unlikely to be a single factor and that considerable tissue and species differences exist for the nature and cellular targets of the hyperpolarizing factors.

This publication has 25 references indexed in Scilit: