Temporal and geographical variation in UK obstetricians’ personal preference regarding mode of delivery
- 1 January 2002
- journal article
- Published by Elsevier in European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology
- Vol. 100 (2) , 185-188
- https://doi.org/10.1016/s0301-2115(01)00468-7
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 13 references indexed in Scilit:
- Rates and implications of caesarean sections in Latin America: ecological study Commentary: all women should have a choice Commentary: increase in caesarean sections may reflect medical control not women's choice Commentary: "health has become secondary to a sexually attractive body"BMJ, 1999
- The rise in caesarean section rate: the same indications but a lower thresholdBJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 1998
- Caesarean sectionCurrent Opinion in Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1997
- What is the right number of caesarean sections?The Lancet, 1997
- Health sector reform and rise of caesarean birth in ChileThe Lancet, 1997
- The cesarean birth epidemic: Trends, causes, and solutionsAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1996
- Obstetricians' views on caesarean section versus vaginal birthThe Lancet, 1996
- Obstetricians' personal choice and mode of deliveryThe Lancet, 1996
- Obstetric practice and the prevalence of urinary incontinence three months after deliveryBJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 1996
- Anal-Sphincter Disruption during Vaginal DeliveryNew England Journal of Medicine, 1993