Performance and its measurement.
Open Access
- 1 February 1984
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
- Vol. 18 (S1) , 5S-11S
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2125.1984.tb02577.x
Abstract
Performance involves numerous sub-functions, and cannot be treated as a unit. Several attempts have been made to separate functions impaired by different classes of drug: for example, high (monitoring) vs lower (performing) levels of function, early (perceptual) vs later (motor) functions, and strategic vs executive functions. The practical implications are that one cannot predict effects of a drug from a single performance test. One must either simulate the practical situation exactly, or use a battery of analytical tests to form a profile of effects. The latter is the policy urged in this paper.Keywords
This publication has 12 references indexed in Scilit:
- The effects of noise on recall and recognition of instances of categoriesActa Psychologica, 1982
- Word recognition in loud noiseActa Psychologica, 1979
- Memory Based Performance Measures in Studies of ShiftworkErgonomics, 1978
- Effects of amphetamine and barbiturate in a serial reaction task under paced and self-paced conditionsActa Psychologica, 1978
- Behavioural antagonism between chlorpromazine and noise in manPsychopharmacology, 1977
- Interaction of Noise with Alcohol on a Task of Sustained AttentionErgonomics, 1975
- Effects of noise, activation level, and response dominance on retrieval from semantic memory.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 1975
- Interference between concurrent tasks of driving and telephoning.Journal of Applied Psychology, 1969
- Interaction of Alcohol with Incentive and with Sleep Deprivation.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1968
- NOISE, PACED PERFORMANCE AND VIGILANCE TASKSThe British Journal of Psychology. General Section, 1953