Inaccuracies inherent in dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry in vivo bone mineral densitometry may flaw osteopenic/osteoporotic interpretations and mislead assessment of antiresorptive therapy effectiveness
- 2 May 2001
- Vol. 28 (5) , 548-555
- https://doi.org/10.1016/s8756-3282(01)00423-9
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 42 references indexed in Scilit:
- Analytic and quantitative exposition of patient‐specific systematic inaccuracies inherent in planar DXA‐derived in vivo BMD measurementsMedical Physics, 1998
- Pitfalls in the Measurement of Bone Mineral Density by Dual Energy X-ray AbsorptiometrySpine, 1996
- Inhomogeneity in body fat distribution may result in inaccuracy in the measurement of vertebral bone massJournal of Bone and Mineral Research, 1995
- Precision and accuracy of measurements of whole-body bone mineral: comparisons between Hologic, Lunar and Norland dual-energy X-ray absorptiometersThe British Journal of Radiology, 1994
- Errors due to non-uniform distribution of fat in dual X-ray absorptiometry of the lumbar spineThe British Journal of Radiology, 1992
- Dual energy x-ray absorptiometry: The effects of beam hardening on bone density measurementsMedical Physics, 1992
- Evaluation of a new set of calibration standards for the measurement of fat content via DPA and DXAMedical Physics, 1992
- Triple photon absorptimetry cannot correct for fat inhomogeneities in lumbar spine bone mineral measurementsClinical Physics and Physiological Measurement, 1990
- The error due to fat inhomogeneity in lumbar spine bone mineral measurementsClinical Physics and Physiological Measurement, 1989
- The effect of fat on bone mineral measurements in normal subjects with recommended values of bone, muscle and fat attenuation coefficientsClinical Physics and Physiological Measurement, 1987