Modeling Asymmetric Comovements of Asset Returns
- 1 October 1998
- journal article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in The Review of Financial Studies
- Vol. 11 (4) , 817-844
- https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/11.4.817
Abstract
Existing time-varying covariance models usually impose strong restrictions on how past shocks affect the forecasted covariance matrix. In this article we compare the restrictions imposed by the four most popular multivariate GARCH models, and introduce a set of robust conditional moment tests to detect misspecification. We demonstrate that the choice of a multivariate volatility model can lead to substantially different conclusions in any application that involves forecasting dynamic covariance matrices (like estimating the optimal hedge ratio or deriving the risk minimizing portfolio). We therefore introduce a general model which nests these four models and their natural “asymmetric” extensions. The new model is applied to study the dynamic relation between large and small firm returns.Keywords
This publication has 20 references indexed in Scilit:
- Inferring Future Volatility from the Information in Implied Volatility in Eurodollar Options: A New ApproachThe Review of Financial Studies, 1997
- Another Look at Models of the Short-Term Interest RateJournal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 1996
- Multivariate Simultaneous Generalized ARCHEconometric Theory, 1995
- Measuring and Testing the Impact of News on VolatilityThe Journal of Finance, 1993
- ARCH modeling in financeJournal of Econometrics, 1992
- Asymmetric Predictability of Conditional VariancesThe Review of Financial Studies, 1991
- Bivariate garch estimation of the optimal commodity futures HedgeJournal of Applied Econometrics, 1991
- Modelling the Coherence in Short-Run Nominal Exchange Rates: A Multivariate Generalized Arch ModelThe Review of Economics and Statistics, 1990
- Asset pricing with a factor-arch covariance structureJournal of Econometrics, 1990
- A Capital Asset Pricing Model with Time-Varying CovariancesJournal of Political Economy, 1988