Virtual Electrode–Induced Phase Singularity
- 4 May 1998
- journal article
- other
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Circulation Research
- Vol. 82 (8) , 918-925
- https://doi.org/10.1161/01.res.82.8.918
Abstract
—Delivery of a strong electric shock to the heart remains the only effective therapy against ventricular fibrillation. Despite significant improvements in implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) therapy, the fundamental mechanisms of defibrillation remain poorly understood. We have recently demonstrated that a monophasic defibrillation shock produces a highly nonuniform epicardial polarization pattern, referred to as a virtual electrode pattern (VEP). The VEP consists of large adjacent areas of strong positive and negative polarization. We sought to determine whether the VEP may be responsible for defibrillation failure by creating dispersion of postshock repolarization and reentry. Truncated exponential biphasic and monophasic shocks were delivered from a bipolar ICD lead in Langendorff-perfused rabbit hearts. Epicardial electrical activity was mapped during and after defibrillation shocks and shocks applied at the plateau phase of a normal action potential produced by ventricular pacing. A high-resolution fluorescence mapping system with 256 recording sites and a voltage-sensitive dye were used. Biphasic shocks with a weak second phase (70%) produced VEPs of reversed polarity. Both of these waveforms resulted in extra beats and arrhythmias. However, biphasic waveforms with intermediate second-phase voltages (20% to 70% of first-phase voltage) produced no VEP, because of an asymmetric reversal of the first-phase polarization. Therefore, there was no substrate for postshock dispersion of repolarization. Shocks producing strong VEPs resulted in postshock reentrant arrhythmias via a mechanism of phase singularity. Points of phase singularity were created by the shock in the intersection of areas of positive, negative, and no polarization, which were set by the shock to excited, excitable, and refractory states, respectively. Shock-induced VEPs may reinduce arrhythmias via a phase-singularity mechanism. Strong shocks may overcome the preshock electrical activity and create phase singularities, regardless of the preshock phase distribution. Optimal defibrillation waveforms did not produce VEPs because of an asymmetric effect of phase reversal on membrane polarization.Keywords
This publication has 16 references indexed in Scilit:
- Transmembrane Voltage Changes Produced by Real and Virtual Electrodes During Monophasic Defibrillation Shock Delivered by an Implantable ElectrodeJournal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology, 1997
- Effect of Electrode Polarity on Internal Defibrillation with Monophasic and Biphasic Waveforms Using an Endocardial Lead SystemJournal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology, 1997
- Dynamics of rotating vortices in the Beeler-Reuter model of cardiac tissueChaos, Solitons, and Fractals, 1995
- A mathematical model of make and break electrical stimulation of cardiac tissue by a unipolar anode or cathodeIEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, 1995
- Mechanisms of Defibrillation for Monophasic and Biphasic WaveformsPacing and Clinical Electrophysiology, 1994
- Refractory period prolongation by biphasic defibrillator waveforms is associated with enhanced sodium current in a computer model of the ventricular action potentialIEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, 1994
- Stimulus-induced critical point. Mechanism for electrical initiation of reentry in normal canine myocardium.Journal of Clinical Investigation, 1989
- Termination of ventricular fibrillation in dogs by depolarizing a critical amount of myocardiumThe American Journal of Cardiology, 1975
- A conceptual model of atrial fibrillationJournal of Electrocardiology, 1968
- VENTRICULAR FIBRILLATION OF LONG DURATION ABOLISHED BY ELECTRIC SHOCKJAMA, 1947