Factors associated with wolverine Gulo gulo predation on domestic sheep
- 25 December 1999
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in Journal of Applied Ecology
- Vol. 36 (6) , 963-973
- https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2664.1999.00451.x
Abstract
Summary: 1. Following a long history of eradication campaigns against predators, wolverine Gulo gulo distribution and numbers became critically low in Norway in the 1960s. Consequently, wolverines were protected by law during the 1970s and 1980s. This led to an increase in wolverine numbers and re‐establishment in some formerly occupied habitats, resulting in increased depredation on domestic reindeer Rangifer tarandus and sheep Ovis aries. Wolverine control and licensed hunting have been used increasingly as tools to reduce the depredation since protection was introduced. However, the factors influencing the level of this depredation have not been studied. We therefore examined losses of domestic sheep grazing unattended on upland summer ranges in the Snøhetta plateau of south central Norway during 1979–94, in relation to wolverine population numbers, reproduction and control measures. This area was recently re‐occupied by wolverines and reproduction has been recorded regularly from the beginning of the study period. 2. The number of ewes and lambs recorded in organized grazing areas increased more than fivefold during the period, and losses increased proportionally with sheep numbers. The differences in losses among municipalities and grazing co‐operatives were probably related to sheep breeds and local variation in wolverine density. 3. The heavy Dala sheep breed was most at risk, whereas losses from the lighter Norwegian short‐tailed and Norwegian fur‐bearing breeds were lower than expected. 4. Killing of wolverines led to fewer lambs being lost in the same year that the wolverine killing took place, but the effect quickly declined, implying a rapid re‐establishment of wolverines in the local area. 5. Lambs were more vulnerable to wolverine predation than ewes, and losses were higher in wolverine cub‐rearing areas than in the area as a whole. 6. We conclude that: (i) control programmes for wolverines, as practised today, will have little long‐term effect in reducing sheep losses, unless wolverines are eradicated or severely reduced in numbers; (ii) the introduction of more agile sheep breeds will probably reduce losses; (iii) in areas where wolverine control to protect sheep is a threat towards wolverine conservation, the present sheep husbandry system of grazing unguarded sheep in the mountains should be replaced by alternative forms that provide the sheep with more protection. This is particularly important in wolverine denning areas.Keywords
This publication has 16 references indexed in Scilit:
- Home-range sizes and altitude selection for arctic foxes and wolverines in an alpine environmentCanadian Journal of Zoology, 1998
- Compatibility of brown bear Ursus arctos and free-ranging sheep in NorwayBiological Conservation, 1997
- Wolverines and their prey in southern NorwayCanadian Journal of Zoology, 1997
- Diet of red foxes (Vulpes vulpes) in South-west New South Wales, with relevance to lamb predation.The Rangeland Journal, 1993
- Influence of Weather and Density on Lamb Survival of Desert Mountain SheepThe Journal of Wildlife Management, 1986
- Evaluation of Wolf Control to Reduce Cattle Predation in AlbertaJournal of Range Management, 1985
- Circumstances Associated with Predation Rates on Sheep and GoatsJournal of Range Management, 1984
- Ecology of the wolverine in northwestern MontanaCanadian Journal of Zoology, 1981
- Domestic Animal Losses to Coyotes and Dogs in IowaThe Journal of Wildlife Management, 1978
- Notes on the Wolverine in Alaska and the Yukon TerritoryThe Journal of Wildlife Management, 1972