Antimicrobial therapy for patients with severe sepsis and septic shock: An evidence-based review
- 1 November 2004
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Critical Care Medicine
- Vol. 32 (Supplement) , S495-S512
- https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ccm.0000143118.41100.14
Abstract
In 2003, critical care and infectious disease experts representing 11 international organizations developed management guidelines for antimicrobial therapy for patients with severe sepsis and septic shock that would be of practical use for the bedside clinician, under the auspices of the Surviving Sepsis Campaign, an international effort to increase awareness and improve outcome in severe sepsis. The process included a modified Delphi method, a consensus conference, several subsequent smaller meetings of subgroups and key individuals, teleconferences, and electronic-based discussion among subgroups and among the entire committee. The modified Delphi methodology used for grading recommendations built on a 2001 publication sponsored by the International Sepsis Forum. We undertook a systematic review of the literature graded along five levels to create recommendation grades from A to E, with A being the highest grade. Pediatric considerations to contrast adult and pediatric management are in the article by Parker et al. on p. S591. Since the prompt institution of therapy that is active against the causative pathogen is one of the most important predictors of outcome, clinicians must establish a system for rapid administration of a rationally chosen drug or combination of drugs when sepsis or septic shock is suspected. The expanding number of antibacterial, antifungal, and antiviral agents available provides opportunities for effective empiric and specific therapy. However, to minimize the promotion of antimicrobial resistance and cost and to maximize efficacy, detailed knowledge of the likely pathogens and the properties of the available drugs is necessary for the intensivist.Keywords
This publication has 190 references indexed in Scilit:
- A Randomized, Double-Blind Comparative Trial Evaluating the Safety of Liposomal Amphotericin B versus Amphotericin B Lipid Complex in the Empirical Treatment of Febrile NeutropeniaClinical Infectious Diseases, 2000
- Practice Guidelines for the Management of Community-Acquired Pneumonia in AdultsClinical Infectious Diseases, 2000
- Canadian Guidelines for the Initial Management of Community-Acquired Pneumonia: An Evidence-Based Update by the Canadian Infectious Diseases Society and the Canadian Thoracic SocietyClinical Infectious Diseases, 2000
- Occurrence of yeast bloodstream infections between 1987 and 1995 in five Dutch university hospitalsEuropean Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases, 1996
- Fluconazole treatment of children with severe fungal infections not treatable with conventional agentsEuropean Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases, 1994
- Cefoperazone versus ceftriaxone monotherapy of nosocomial pneumoniaDiagnostic Microbiology and Infectious Disease, 1992
- Comparison of the efficacy and adverse effect profile of cefotaxime and ceftriaxone in ICU patients with susceptible infectionsDiagnostic Microbiology and Infectious Disease, 1992
- A clinical study of fluconazole for the treatment of deep mycosesDiagnostic Microbiology and Infectious Disease, 1989
- Ceftazidime Combined with a Short or Long Course of Amikacin for Empirical Therapy of Gram-Negative Bacteremia in Cancer Patients with GranulocytopeniaNew England Journal of Medicine, 1987
- Controlled Comparison of Amikacin and GentamicinNew England Journal of Medicine, 1977