Patient perspective of measuring treatment efficacy: The rheumatoid arthritis patient priorities for pharmacologic interventions outcomes
Open Access
- 29 April 2010
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Arthritis Care & Research
- Vol. 62 (5) , 647-656
- https://doi.org/10.1002/acr.20151
Abstract
Objective Collaboration with patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) highlights that outcomes important to them include fatigue, coping, and life enjoyment. However, these are not commonly measured in clinical trials. There is little evidence about which outcomes patients would prioritize, or what factors influence patients' prioritization. Our objective was to develop a complementary core set with patients to promote inclusion of their priority outcomes in pharmacologic interventions. Methods Nominal groups were conducted with RA patients to rank 63 outcomes generated from previous in‐depth interviews. A multicenter postal survey provided the final selection of core outcomes for the Rheumatoid Arthritis Patient Priorities for Pharmacologic Interventions (RAPP‐PI), in which RA patients rated the importance of the priority outcomes from the nominal groups and ranked the top 6. Results Twenty‐six patients participated in 5 nominal group discussions and reduced the 63 initial outcomes to the 32 most important. A total of 254 participants in the survey ranked priority treatment outcomes to form the RAPP‐PI: pain, activities of daily living, joint damage, mobility, life enjoyment, independence, fatigue, and valued activities. The 8 priorities represent 3 domains of treatment outcomes: direct impact of RA, psychosocial well‐being, and function/participation. Chi‐square tests showed that disease severity, disease duration, sex, and patients' perceptions of managing, self‐efficacy, and normality influenced the selection of priority treatment outcomes. Conclusion Collaboration with patients has captured their perspectives of priority outcomes from pharmacologic interventions. Although there is some overlap with professional core outcomes, the additional use of this complementary set will give a broader evaluation of effectiveness of interventions from the key stakeholders: patients.Keywords
This publication has 30 references indexed in Scilit:
- What outcomes from pharmacologic treatments are important to people with rheumatoid arthritis? Creating the basis of a patient core setArthritis Care & Research, 2010
- Elaboration of the preliminary Rheumatoid Arthritis Impact of Disease (RAID) score: a EULAR initiativeAnnals of the Rheumatic Diseases, 2009
- Reporting of patient-reported outcomes in recent trials in rheumatoid arthritis: a systematic literature reviewAnnals of the Rheumatic Diseases, 2009
- OMERACT: An international initiative to improve outcome measurement in rheumatologyTrials, 2007
- Validation of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) Core Set for rheumatoid arthritis from the patient perspective using focus groupsArthritis Research & Therapy, 2006
- Patients' perceptions of treatment with anti-TNF therapy for rheumatoid arthritis: a qualitative studyRheumatology, 2004
- Occupational balance of women with rheumatoid arthritis: a qualitative studyMusculoskeletal Care, 2004
- Rheumatology outcomes: the patient's perspective.2003
- Preferences for improved health examined in 1,024 patients with rheumatoid arthritis: Pain has highest priorityArthritis Care & Research, 2002
- Measuring quality of life: Is quality of life determined by expectations or experience?BMJ, 2001