The effects of monensin, narasin, salinomycin and nicarbazin, on field strains of chicken coccidia
Open Access
- 1 January 1988
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Avian Pathology
- Vol. 17 (4) , 793-801
- https://doi.org/10.1080/03079458808436502
Abstract
The sensitivity was established in vivo of 47 isolates of coccidia obtained from commercial broiler sites, to monensin, narasin, salinomycin and nicarbazin. Seventeen samples were obtained from the UK, 15 from the Netherlands, six from West Germany, six from Spain, and one each from France, Italy and Israel. Fourteen (30%) samples were predominantly Eimeria acervulina, 18 (38%) predominantly E. tenella. The remaining 15 (32%) were mixed species, predominantly E. acervulina and E. tenella with some samples showing lesions characteristic of E. maxima and E. brunetti. All isolates were ionophore‐tolerant, as judged by lesions, weight gain, feed conversion and mortality. Most isolates were sensitive to nicarbazin. Cross‐resistance was evident between all ionophores but not between ionophores and nicarabazin.This publication has 19 references indexed in Scilit:
- Drug Responsiveness of Field Isolates of Chicken CoccidiaPoultry Science, 1982
- Anticoccidial Activity of Narasin in Broiler Chickens Reared in Floor PensPoultry Science, 1980
- Studies on the sensitivity of recent field isolates ofE. maximato monensinAvian Pathology, 1979
- Comparison of Anticoccidial Efficacy, Resistance and Tolerance of Narasin, Monensin and Lasalocid in Chicken Battery TrialsPoultry Science, 1977
- Eimeria tenella in chickens: Studies on resistance to the anticoccidial drugs monensin and lasalocidVeterinary Parasitology, 1976
- Lasalocid: Resistance and Cross-Resistance Studies in Eimeria tenella-Infected ChicksPoultry Science, 1975
- Anticoccidial drugs: Lesion scoring techniques in battery and floor-pen experiments with chickensExperimental Parasitology, 1970