Life Events Assessment of Depressed Patients: A Comparison of Self-report and Interview Formats

Publisher Website
Google Scholar
Abstract
Both self-report questionnaires and semi-structured interviews have been employed in past research on the association between life events and psychiatric disorder. We examined the comparability of these two approaches by giving both a self-report life events scale and semi-structured life events interview to 38 depressed patients. About 40% of the items noted on the interview were missed when using the questionnaire. Approximately 15% of the items noted on the questionnaire were errors since the events did not meet the definition or time criteria specified in the questionnaire. Twenty percent of the items noted on the questionnaire were not noted on the interview and may represent underinclusiveness on the part of the interview. The implications of these differences were examined by comparing the association between a variety of demographic and clinical variables and life events under each methodology. There were no significant differences between the two methods except when examining the association between life events and other subjective self-report measures.

This publication has 22 references indexed in Scilit: