Seniority 1975: Old Theories Confront New Facts
- 1 October 1976
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in British Journal of Political Science
- Vol. 6 (4) , 383-399
- https://doi.org/10.1017/s0007123400000818
Abstract
The seniority system in the American Congress exhibits many characteristics of its parent institution. Both are held to be powerful, durable, and somewhat peculiar. Both celebrate age, tradition, and a particular kind of experience. They are skeptical of new things – whether policies, computerized information systems, or newly elected members. Both can be attacked for sluggishness, defense of thestatus quo, and lack of vigor and merit in leadership. The family resemblance goes further. Both have been century-long targets of criticism and attempts at reform. And both have resisted these attacks by doing what they do best – by simplyoutlastingthe reform attempts and the reformers.Keywords
This publication has 8 references indexed in Scilit:
- Congress CalendarAndrologia, 2009
- House Careerists: Changing Patterns of Longevity and AttritionAmerican Political Science Review, 1972
- Congressional Leadership Selection and Support: A Comparative AnalysisThe Journal of Politics, 1970
- The Growth of the Seniority System in the U. S. House of RepresentativesAmerican Political Science Review, 1969
- The Rise of Seniority in the House of RepresentativesPolity, 1968
- The Institutionalization of the U.S. House of RepresentativesAmerican Political Science Review, 1968
- Safe Seats, Seniority, and Power in CongressAmerican Political Science Review, 1965
- The Morse Committee Assignment Controversy: A Study in Senate NormsAmerican Political Science Review, 1957