How is morphological decomposition achieved?
- 1 August 1994
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Language and Cognitive Processes
- Vol. 9 (3) , 369-391
- https://doi.org/10.1080/01690969408402124
Abstract
Two experiments investigated morphological decomposition in ambiguous novel compounds such as BUSHEATER, which can be parsed as either BUS-HEATER or BUSH-EATER. It was found that subjects' parsing choices for such words are influenced by orthographic constraints, but that these constraints do not operate prelexically. Lexical decision response times for ambiguous novel compounds were found to be longer than those for non-ambiguous novel compounds such as LARKEATER. This finding supports the view that all legal lexical entries in a multimorphemic string are automatically activated during visual word recognition. The claim that morphological parsing proceeds from left to right and lexical access is automatic and obligatory is presented as the Automatic Progressive Parsing and Lexical Excitation (APPLE) model of lexical processing.Keywords
This publication has 25 references indexed in Scilit:
- Lexical access and inflectional morphologyPublished by Elsevier ,2002
- Morphological analysis in sentence readingJournal of Memory and Language, 1987
- Morphological influences on lexical access: Lexical or nonlexical effects?Journal of Memory and Language, 1986
- The TRACE model of speech perceptionCognitive Psychology, 1986
- Relations among regular and irregular morphologically related words in the lexicon as revealed by repetition primingMemory & Cognition, 1985
- Reading mechanisms and the organisation of the lexicon: Evidence from acquired dyslexiaCognitive Neuropsychology, 1985
- Address mechanisms to decomposed lexical entriesLinguistics, 1985
- The suffixing preference: a processing explanationLinguistics, 1985
- Representation of inflected nouns in the internal lexiconMemory & Cognition, 1980
- The processing of affixed wordsMemory & Cognition, 1977