Current management of tibial shaft fractures: A survey of 450 Canadian orthopedic trauma surgeons
Open Access
- 1 January 2008
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Medical Journals Sweden AB in Acta Orthopaedica
- Vol. 79 (5) , 689-694
- https://doi.org/10.1080/17453670810016722
Abstract
Background and purpose Strategies to manage tibial fractures include nonoperative and operative approaches. Strategies to enhance healing include a variety of bone stimulators. It is not known what forms of management for tibial fractures predominate among Canadian orthopedic surgeons. We therefore asked a representative sample of orthopedic trauma surgeons about their management of tibial fracture patients. Methods This was a cross-sectional survey of 450 Canadian orthopedic trauma surgeons. We inquired about demographic variables and current tibial shaft fracture management strategies. Results 268 surgeons completed the survey, a response rate of 60%. Most respondents (80%) managed closed tibial shaft fracture operatively; 47% preferred reamed intramedullary nailing and 40% preferred unreamed. For open tibial shaft fractures, 59% of surgeons preferred reamed intramedullary nailing. Some surgeons (16%) reported use of bone stimulators for management of uncomplicated open and closed tibial shaft fractures, and almost half (45%) made use of this adjunctive modality for complicated tibial shaft fractures. Low-intensity pulsed ultrasound and electrical stimulation proved equally popular (21% each) and 80% of respondents felt that a reduction in healing time of 6 weeks or more, attributed to a bone stimulator, would be clinically important. Interpretation Current practice regarding orthopedic management of tibial shaft fractures in Canada strongly favors operative treatment with intramedullary nailing, although respondents were divided in their preference for reamed and unreamed nailing. Use of bone stimulators is common as an adjunctive modality in this injury population. Large randomized trials are needed to provide better evidence to guide clinical decision making regarding the choice of reamed or unreamed nailing for tibial shaft fractures, and to inform surgeons about the actual effect of bone stimulators.Keywords
This publication has 16 references indexed in Scilit:
- A review of the management of open fractures of the tibia and femurThe Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. British volume, 2006
- Operative Management of Displaced Femoral Neck Fractures in Elderly PatientsJournal of Bone and Joint Surgery, 2005
- Should the tibia be reamed when nailing?Injury, 2005
- Therapeutic ultrasound and fracture healing: A survey of beliefs and practicesArchives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 2004
- A randomized trial of opinion leader endorsement in a survey of orthopaedic surgeons: effect on primary response ratesInternational Journal of Epidemiology, 2003
- Surgeons' Preferences for the Operative Treatment of Fractures of the Tibial ShaftJournal of Bone and Joint Surgery, 2001
- Low-Intensity Pulsed Ultrasound in the Treatment of NonunionsPublished by Wolters Kluwer Health ,2001
- Comparison of Open and Closed Questionnaire Formats in Obtaining Demographic Information From Canadian General InternistsJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 1999
- Closed Fractures of the Tibial ShaftJournal of Bone and Joint Surgery, 1998
- A Prospective Study of Venous Thromboembolism after Major TraumaNew England Journal of Medicine, 1994