THE CONCEPT OF SOCIAL ROLE REVISITED
- 1 June 1992
- journal article
- other
- Published by SAGE Publications in Gender & Society
- Vol. 6 (2) , 301-313
- https://doi.org/10.1177/089124392006002010
Abstract
A new critical chapter in the long history of polemics about the concept of role has been written by some feminist sociologists. These authors point to a number of limitations in “the language of roles.” They charge that this approach “retains its functionalist roots,” focuses more on individuals than on social structure, and has other flaws. Having assessed the validity of these critiques, this article examines some recent alternative conceptualizations of gender. The comparative analysis concludes that each of the proposed conceptualizations illuminates some selected features, but none, including the role perspective, can serve as an all-inclusive paradigm for the study of gender.Keywords
This publication has 11 references indexed in Scilit:
- Doing GenderGender & Society, 1987
- The Missing Feminist Revolution in SociologySocial Problems, 1985
- Boundaries, Negotiation, Consciousness: Reconceptualizing Gender RelationsSocial Problems, 1985
- On the Term "Sex Roles"Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 1978
- The arrangement between the sexesTheory and Society, 1977
- The Sociology of Sociology.Social Forces, 1972
- Parental Role DifferentiationAmerican Journal of Sociology, 1961
- The Oversocialized Conception of Man in Modern SociologyAmerican Sociological Review, 1961
- A Theory of Role StrainAmerican Sociological Review, 1960
- Cultural Contradictions and Sex RolesAmerican Journal of Sociology, 1946