Integrating ideology and archetype in rhetorical criticism, part II: A case studyof Jaws
- 1 February 1993
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Quarterly Journal of Speech
- Vol. 79 (1) , 61-81
- https://doi.org/10.1080/00335639309384019
Abstract
This essay offers a case study follow‐up to an article previously published in this journal. The present installment applies the critical approach developed in the initial work, which integrates ideology and archetypal concerns, to examine the film Jaws. The critique is situated as a counterpoint to prior analysis by Marxist critic Fredric Jameson and archetypal critic Jane Caputi. Set within the American culture myth of the frontier hunter, Jaws scapegoats the feminine principle for sociopolitical maladies, and reveals how the social hierarchy fractures and devitalizes both masculine and feminine identities.Keywords
This publication has 10 references indexed in Scilit:
- Frontierism and the materialization of the psyche: The rhetoric of InnerspaceSouthern Communication Journal, 1991
- Integrating ideology and archetype in rhetorical criticismQuarterly Journal of Speech, 1991
- Evolution of “the new frontier” inAlienandAliens:Patriarchal co‐optation of the feminine archetypeQuarterly Journal of Speech, 1989
- Gendered technology, gendered practiceCritical Studies in Mass Communication, 1988
- Mythic evolution of “The new frontier” in mass mediated rhetoricCritical Studies in Mass Communication, 1986
- The rhetoric of the American western mythCommunication Monographs, 1983
- “The deer hunter”: Rhetoric of the warriorQuarterly Journal of Speech, 1980
- Reification and Utopia in Mass CultureSocial Text, 1979
- Jaws as Patriarchal MythJournal of Popular Film, 1978
- The evolution of the archetypal sea in rhetoric and poeticQuarterly Journal of Speech, 1977