Familial adenomatous polyposis
- 1 January 1992
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Diseases of the Colon & Rectum
- Vol. 35 (1) , 12-15
- https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02053332
Abstract
To compare the clinical and functional results of ileorectostomy (IR) and ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) in patients with familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP), we reviewed the results of 94 IPAA patients and 21 IR patients who were operated upon between 1978 and 1988. The groups were similar with respect to age and sex. None of the patients died postoperatiyely. Postoperative complications occurred in 28 percent of the IPAA group and in 17 percent of the IR group (P>0.1). Seven percent of IPAA patients described symptoms compatible with pouchitis. Sixty-one percent of IR patients required subsequent fulguration of rectal polyps at least once. IR patients had a mean (±SD) of 4 (±2) stools per day, while IPAA patients had 5 (±2) stools per day (P>0.05). No significant difference in daytime soiling was present between IR (6 percent) and IPAA (4 percent). Nighttime spotting was also similar between the two groups. Nighttime soiling, however, was reported by 4 percent of IPAA patients but not by IR patients (PKeywords
This publication has 7 references indexed in Scilit:
- Ileal Pouch-Anal AnastomosisAnnals of Surgery, 1989
- Quality of Life After Brooke Ileostomy and Ileal Pouch-Anal AnastomosisAnnals of Surgery, 1989
- Ileal Pouch-Anal Anastomosis for Chronic Ulcerative ColitisAnnals of Surgery, 1987
- The spectum in adenomatous polyposis: The St. Mark's policyBritish Journal of Surgery, 1985
- Rectal Cancer Following Colectomy for PolyposisArchives of Surgery, 1980
- Surgical management of familial polyposis and Gardner's syndromeThe American Journal of Surgery, 1979
- Comparison of bowel function after ileorectal anastomosis for ulcerative colitis and colonic polyposis.Gut, 1975