Abdominal Radiograph and Renal Ultrasound Versus Excretory Urography in the Evaluation of Asymptomatic Patients after Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy
- 1 December 1989
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Journal of Urology
- Vol. 142 (6) , 1419-1423
- https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-5347(17)39114-0
Abstract
A prospective study was done to compare the relative efficacy of an abdominal radiograph and renal ultrasound to excretory urography for the evaluation of asymptomatic patients 1 month after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy. We evaluated 101 renal units in 84 asymptomatic patients who had undergone extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy 1 month previously with abdominal radiography, excretory urography and ultrasonography to evaluate the presence of retained stone fragments, dilatation of the collecting system and intrarenal or perirenal fluid collections and masses. The combination of abdominal radiography and ultrasonography identified retained fragments in 62 renal units, while excretory urography identified them in 54. Ultrasonography was less specific in identifying dilatation of part or all of the collecting system; proving falsely positive in 7 renal units and falsely negative in 14 compared to excretory urography. However, the case of obstruction was diagnosed correctly by both modalities. Finally, ultrasound appeared to be more specific and more sensitive in the evaluation of the presence of intrarenal or perirenal abnormalities. We conclude that a combination of abdominal radiography and ultrasonography is as good or better than excretory urography in identifying residual stone fragments and intrarenal or perirenal abnormalities. However, the finding of dilatation of all or part of the collecting system by ultrasonography is nonspecific and probably is better evaluated by excretory urography. We suggest that the routine radiological evaluation of asymptomatic patients 1 month after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy could be limited routinely to abdominal radiography and ultrasonography. However, when abnormalities of the collecting system are visualized on these studies excretory urography should be performed.This publication has 20 references indexed in Scilit:
- Comparison of Results and Morbidity of Percutaneous Nephrostolithotomy and Extracorporeal Shock Wave LithotripsyJournal of Urology, 1987
- Sonographic evaluation of renal stones treated by extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsyAmerican Journal of Roentgenology, 1987
- Significant renal hemorrhage following extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy: imaging and clinical features.Radiology, 1987
- Silent Renal Obstruction With Severe Functional Loss After Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy: A Report of 2 CasesJournal of Urology, 1987
- The Complications of Extracorporeal Shockwave Lithotripsy: Management and PreventionBritish Journal of Urology, 1986
- Report of the United States Cooperative Study of Extracorporeal Shock Wave LithotripsyJournal of Urology, 1986
- Renal stone disease treated with extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy: short-term observations in 100 patients.Radiology, 1986
- Renal morphology and function immediately after extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsyAmerican Journal of Roentgenology, 1985
- Extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy (ESWL) for treatment of urolithiasisUrology, 1984
- EXTRACORPOREALLY INDUCED DESTRUCTION OF KIDNEY STONES BY SHOCK WAVESThe Lancet, 1980