Bias in Treatment Assignment in Controlled Clinical Trials
- 14 June 1984
- journal article
- Published by Massachusetts Medical Society in New England Journal of Medicine
- Vol. 310 (24) , 1610-1612
- https://doi.org/10.1056/nejm198406143102419
Abstract
To the Editor: Like Chalmers et al., we believe in "the necessity for blinding the randomization process in a controlled trial" in order to minimize bias (Dec. 1 issue).* However, we found their paper to be an even more dramatic example of the insidiousness of this problem in the clinical literature than they might have intended. The authors themselves have fallen prey to the same shortcomings — namely, the use of maldislributed variables and historical controls — that they decry. One can see this by first examining their Table 2, in which some "types of treatments studied" are maldistributed: for . . .Keywords
This publication has 4 references indexed in Scilit:
- Bias in Treatment Assignment in Controlled Clinical TrialsNew England Journal of Medicine, 1983
- The Role of the Randomized Clinical Trial in the Evaluation of New OperationsSurgical Clinics of North America, 1982
- Are Randomized Trials Appropriate for Evaluating New Operations?New England Journal of Medicine, 1979
- Nonevaluable patients in clinical cancer researchCancer, 1975