Frequency of ethical dilemmas in a medical inpatient service

Abstract
The frequency of ethical problems in a general medical ward at a university hospital was studied using a quasi-experimental prospective design. In the baseline period, ethical problems were determined by self-report of residents. In the intervention period, a participant-observer was present during attending rounds. Ethical problems were determined by consensus among the attending physician, resident and participant-observer. No significant differences between baseline and intervention periods were found in patient variations, admissions per resident or rating of each resident''s sensitivity to ethical issues. In the baseline period, 7 (3.9%) of 179 cases involved ethical problems. In the intervention period, 16 (17%) of 92 cases involved ethical problems. This difference was significant. The data imply that residents underidentify ethical problems but that sensitization, sympathetic listening, information and advice increase physician recognition of ethical problems.

This publication has 7 references indexed in Scilit: