A comparison of the PROCAM and Framingham point-scoring systems for estimation of individual risk of coronary heart disease in the Second Northwick Park Heart Study

This publication has 26 references indexed in Scilit:

• Cardiovascular risk and diabetes. Are the methods of risk prediction satisfactory?
  European Journal of Preventive Cardiology, 2004
• Are the Framingham and PROCAM coronary heart disease risk functions applicable to different European populations? The PRIME Study
  European Heart Journal, 2003
• Framingham risk function overestimates risk of coronary heart disease in men and women from Germany—results from the MONICA Augsburg and the PROCAM cohorts
  European Heart Journal, 2003
• Nonfasting Apolipoprotein B and Triglyceride Levels as a Useful Predictor of Coronary Heart Disease Risk in Middle-Aged UK Men
  Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology, 2002
• Simple Scoring Scheme for Calculating the Risk of Acute Coronary Events Based on the 10-Year Follow-Up of the Prospective Cardiovascular Münster (PROCAM) Study
  Circulation, 2002
• Executive Summary of the Third Report of the National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) Expert Panel on Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol in Adults (Adult Treatment Panel III)
  JAMA, 2001
• Lipoprotein (a) as a predictor of myocardial infarction in middle-aged men
  The American Journal of Medicine, 2001
• Comparison of Novel Hemostatic Factors and Conventional Risk Factors for Prediction of Coronary Heart Disease
  Circulation, 2000
• Comparison of the Framingham risk function-based coronary chart with risk function from an Italian population study
  European Heart Journal, 2000
• Correction of Logistic Regression Relative Risk Estimates and Confidence Intervals for Random Within-Person Measurement Error
  American Journal of Epidemiology, 1992