Effects of drought on host and endophyte development in mycorrhizal soybeans in relation to water use and phosphate uptake
- 1 March 1988
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Physiologia Plantarum
- Vol. 72 (3) , 565-571
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-3054.1988.tb09166.x
Abstract
Bethlenfalvay, G. J., Brown, M. S., Ames, R. N. and Thomas, R. S. 1988. Effects of drought on host and endophyte development in mycorrhizal soybeans in relation to water use and phosphate uptake. ‐ Physiol. Plant. 72: 565–571.Soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] plants were grown in pot cultures and inoculated with the vesicular‐arbuscular mycorrhizal (VAM) fungus Glomus mosseae (Nicol. & Gerd.) Gerd. and Trappe or provided with P fertilizer (non‐VAM plants). After an initial growth period (21 days), plants were exposed to cycles of severe, moderate or no drought stress over a subsequent 28‐day period by rewatering at soil water potentials of ‐1.0, ‐0.3 or ‐0.05 MPa. Dry weights of VAM plants were greater at severe stress and smaller at no stress than those of non‐VAM plants. Phosphorus fertilization was applied to produce VAM and non‐VAM plants of the same size at moderate stress. Root and leaf P concentrations were higher in non‐VAM plants at all stress levels. All plants were stressed to permanent wilting prior to harvest. VAM plants had lower soil moisture content at harvest than non‐VAM plants. Colonization of roots by G. mosseae did not vary with stress, but the biomass and length of the extraradical mycelium was greater in severely stressed than in non‐stressed plants. Growth enhancement of VAM plants relative to P‐fertilized non‐VAM plants under severe stress was attributed to increased uptake of water as well as to more efficient P uptake. The ability of VAM plants to deplete soil water to a greater extent than non‐VAM plants suggests lower permanent wilting potentials for the former.Keywords
This publication has 22 references indexed in Scilit:
- Influence of Soil Water Regimes on VA Mycorrhiza IV. Effect on Root Growth and Water Relations of Sorghum bicolorJournal of Agronomy and Crop Science, 1986
- Comparisons Between P‐Fertilized and Mycorrhizal Plants1Crop Science, 1986
- Plant Response to Mycorrhizal Fungi: Host, Endophyte, and Soil EffectsSoil Science Society of America Journal, 1985
- FUNCTIONING OF VESICULAR–ARBUSCULAR MYCORRHIZAS UNDER FIELD CONDITIONSNew Phytologist, 1985
- INFLUENCE OF VESICULAR–ARBUSCULAR MYCORRHIZA ON THE HYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY OF ROOTS OF TWO CITRUS ROOTSTOCKSNew Phytologist, 1984
- EFFECTS OF TWO SPECIES OF V A MYCORRHIZAL FUNGI ON DROUGHT TOLERANCE OF WINTER WHEAT*New Phytologist, 1983
- Increased drought tolerance of mycorrhizal onion plants caused by improved phosphorus nutritionPlanta, 1982
- THE INFLUENCE OF VESICULAR‐ARBUSCULAR MYCORRHIZA ON GROWTH AND WATER RELATIONS OF RED CLOVERNew Phytologist, 1981
- Measurement of Mycorrhizal Infection in SoybeansSoil Science Society of America Journal, 1981
- Phosphorus Absorption by Corn Roots as Affected by Moisture and Phosphorus ConcentrationSoil Science Society of America Journal, 1961