Formalizing Organizational Meaning
- 1 January 1999
- journal article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Discourse & Society
- Vol. 10 (1) , 49-65
- https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926599010001003
Abstract
Formality indexes interactional closure: it limits the possibilities for the renegotiation of agreements and decisions. In this article the focus is on how formality is constructed in organizational settings. The article proposes that organizational formalization is achieved on the strength of the recontextualization of meaning from one discourse or practice to another. Importantly, organizational processes of recontextualization tend to increasingly technologize meanings with respect to both what they signify and their materialization. This means that discursive practices will mobilize, aside from human or embodied modes of meaning making, increasingly disembodied or exosomatic modes of meaning making, such as electronic kinds of communication, as well as other kinds of inscription of meaning (infrastructure, architecture, and so on).Keywords
This publication has 7 references indexed in Scilit:
- Studies in EthnomethodologyPublished by Taylor & Francis ,2023
- Language, Bureaucracy and Social ControlPublished by Taylor & Francis ,2014
- Story generations: From dialogical Interviews to written reports in police interrogationsText & Talk - An Interdisciplinary Journal of Language, Discourse & Communication Studies, 1991
- Notes toward a cultural analysis of formalText & Talk - An Interdisciplinary Journal of Language, Discourse & Communication Studies, 1983
- Understanding Formality: The Categorization and Production of 'Formal' InteractionBritish Journal of Sociology, 1982
- Formal Structure: A Review of the Empirical Relationships Between Task Differentiation, Role Prescription, and Authority DispersionOrganization Studies, 1980
- Formality and Informality in Communicative EventsAmerican Anthropologist, 1979