Invariance of the weight parameter in information integration
Open Access
- 1 January 1976
- journal article
- Published by Springer Nature in Memory & Cognition
- Vol. 4 (1) , 43-47
- https://doi.org/10.3758/bf03213253
Abstract
The relative effect of each informational dimension in an information integration task is a joint function of its weight and the range of values over which it is varied. A method is developed for separating these two factors. Weights obtained by this method were compared across variations of stimulus range. Subjects rated the performance of students on the basis of midterm exam scores and final exam scores. For some subjects, the range of scores on the final exam was twice that on the midterm and the reverse was true for other subjects. An averaging model was shown to describe the results, and weights did not differ for different stimulus ranges. This was true for each of two instructional conditions: one in which a particular weighting strategy was prescribed and one in which there was no prescribed weighting. Students who were instructed to use a 2∶1 weighting were found to assign more than twice as much weight to the final as to the midterm.Keywords
This publication has 6 references indexed in Scilit:
- Averaging processes in ratings and choices based on numerical informationMemory & Cognition, 1974
- Dynamic processes in stimulus integration theory: Effects of feedback on averaging of motor movements.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1974
- Learning effects in information integration: Manipulation of cue validity in an impression formation taskMemory & Cognition, 1973
- Response Scale Effects and Integration Processes in the Averaging of Motor MovementsJournal of Motor Behavior, 1973
- Differential weighting of positive and negative traits in impression formation as a function of prior exposure.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1973
- Averaging versus adding as a stimulus-combination rule in impression formation.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1965