Policy Design and the Development of Policy Indicators
- 1 December 1987
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Knowledge
- Vol. 9 (2) , 278-296
- https://doi.org/10.1177/0164025987009002007
Abstract
There is a clear need for prospective indicators which are useful to government policymakers faced with problems of gauging the future social impacts of science and technology. Prospective indicators may be developed by applying a design approach to science policymaking, an approach that incorporates models of causation, instrumentation, and evaluation. Prospective impact indicators seek to establish causal linkages between future policy outcomes and the instruments available for government intervention. Prospective indicators also seek to broaden the range of evaluative criteria beyond those typically used to assess science (e.g., peer review) as well as science policy (e.g., economic analysis). Policy design is central to the development of policy relevant impact indicators (Dunn et al., this volume) that are causal, relational, and normative.Keywords
This publication has 10 references indexed in Scilit:
- Usable Knowledge, Usable IgnoranceKnowledge, 1987
- Measuring the Cost-Efficiency of Basic Research Investment: Input-Output ApproachesJournal of Policy Analysis and Management, 1987
- The Scientific State: A Theory with HypothesesScience, Technology, & Human Values, 1986
- Social Problems Theory: The Constructionist ViewAnnual Review of Sociology, 1985
- Peer Review and the Consensus Development ProcessScience, Technology, & Human Values, 1985
- The Critical Appraisal of Scientific Inquiries with Policy ImplicationsScience, Technology, & Human Values, 1985
- From Social Theory to Policy DesignJournal of Public Policy, 1984
- Regulation and ScienceScience, Technology, & Human Values, 1984
- POLICY‐GAMBLING: A PRELIMINARY EXPLORATIONPolicy Studies Journal, 1983
- Assessing Basic Research: The Case of the Isaac Newton TelescopeSocial Studies of Science, 1983