Physician's use of laparoscopy.
- 4 November 1978
- Vol. 2 (6147) , 1276-1278
- https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.2.6147.1276
Abstract
The role of laparoscopy in medical practice was assessed by studying 238 consecutive laparoscopies performed under local anaesthesia by physicians in a single teaching hospital. Indications for laparoscopy were assessment of possible and known hepatic disease, possible disseminated abdominal malignancy, abdominal mass, and conditions such as ascites and splenomegaly. A definitive diagnosis was reached in 223 cases (76.5%). No organic disease was detected in 41 patients, though findings were false-negative in two of them (0.8%). The procedure failed in 15 (6.3%), mostly because adhesions from previous surgery hindered adequate visualisation. Six patients (2.5%) had complications, one of whom subsequently died. If patients are appropriately selected laparoscopy is relatively free of postoperative complications, and is an effective diagnostic procedure in abdominal malignancy and decompensated liver disease. Cost-effectiveness is an additional advantage.Keywords
This publication has 11 references indexed in Scilit:
- The value of laparoscopy in general surgery.1977
- Peritoneoscopy and Guided Biopsy in the Diagnosis of Intraabdominal DiseaseGastroenterology, 1976
- The use of laparoscopy in surgical diagnosis.1976
- Laparoscopy in general surgeryThe American Journal of Surgery, 1976
- APPLICATIONS FOR LAPAROSCOPY IN GENERAL SURGERY1976
- A comparison of the accuracy of peritoneoscopy and liver biopsy in the diagnosis of cirrhosisGut, 1974
- Percutaneous Versus Peritoneoscopic Liver BiopsyGastroenterology, 1972
- Combined Peritoneoscopy and Liver Biopsy in the Diagnosis of Hepatic NeoplasmGastroenterology, 1972
- BENEFITS AND HAZARDS OF LAPAROTOMY FOR MEDICAL PATIENTSThe Lancet, 1970
- Surgery in Acute HepatitisPublished by American Medical Association (AMA) ,1963