Clonalism - the Myth?
- 1 January 1990
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Autoimmunity
- Vol. 6 (1-2) , 131-142
- https://doi.org/10.3109/08916939008993377
Abstract
Two regulatory mechanisms, based on the contrasting concepts of imprinting (clonal theories and idiotypic networks) and of ongoing regulation of immune responses (by antigen and end products with specificity for antigen), give rise to different predictions and approaches to the question of autoimmunity and autoimmune disease. Both concepts have legitimacy. however, if a ranking in terms of explicative power must be given, ongoing regulation is more plausible since it accounts more fully for basic events in immune responses and in autoimmune phenomena. Many instructive findings have emerged from experiments based on this latter concept, furthermore, the approach has only received limited notice and, thus. has not yet been exhausted.Keywords
This publication has 51 references indexed in Scilit:
- The mosaic of autoimmunityPublished by Elsevier ,2003
- Rheumatoid factor and Fc signaling: A tale of two CinderellasClinical Immunology and Immunopathology, 1989
- Why peptides? Their possible role in the evolution of MHC-restricted T-cell recognitionImmunology Today, 1989
- Immunological tolerance: new approaches using transgenic miceImmunology Today, 1989
- The thymus selects the useful, neglects the useless and destroys the harmfulImmunology Today, 1989
- Triumphs and trials of immunology in the 1980sImmunology Today, 1988
- The genetic origin of autoantibodiesImmunology Today, 1987
- Cytoskeletal binding of monoclonal anti‐dna antibodies derived from tonsillar lymphoid cells of a normal subjectArthritis & Rheumatism, 1986
- Human Monoclonal Autoantibodies That React with Multiple Endocrine OrgansNew England Journal of Medicine, 1983
- The influence of T lymphocytes on antibody-induced B-cell suppressionImmunology Today, 1983