A Steady‐State Evaluation of the Effects of Propantheline Bromide and Cholestyramine on the Bioavailability of Digoxin When Administered as Tablets or Capsules
- 8 July 1985
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in The Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
- Vol. 25 (5) , 360-364
- https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1552-4604.1985.tb02855.x
Abstract
Drug interactions can profoundly alter the absorption of digoxin in tablet form. This study evaluated whether digoxin solution in capsules, a new dosage form with 90% to 100% bioavailability, would reduce such alterations, specifically those caused by cholestyramine and propantheline bromide. The investigation used a six‐treatment, steady‐state, balanced, incomplete block design with 18 healthy adults studied for four continuous two‐week treatment periods. Treatments were either two 0.25 mg digoxin tablets or two 0.20 mg digoxin capsules administered alone, with propantheline, 15 mg qid, or with cholestyramine, 8 g qd. Bioavailability was determined from steady‐state, 24‐hour area under the serum concentration‐time curve (AUC, ng × h/mL) and from 0‐ and 24‐hour trough serum digoxin concentrations (ng/mL). The AUCs for tablets alone, with cholestyramine, and with propantheline were 32.8 ± 13.3 (± SD), 22.4 ± 12.1, and 40.6 ± 13.9, respectively, while corresponding values for capsules were 31.7 ± 9.3, 24.7 ± 7.9, and 35.9 ± 12.8. The trough concentrations for tablets alone, with cholestyramine, and with propantheline were 0.88 ± 0.47, 0.61 ± 0.38, and 1.09 ± 0.35, respectively; trough concentrations for capsules were 0.77 ± 0.28, 0.74 ± 0.28, and 0.96 ± 0.48, respectively. The only significant differences in AUC were seen when comparing tablets alone versus tablets with cholestyramine (P < .0005) and tablets with propantheline (P < .01). A significant finding was also observed when comparing trough concentrations for tablets alone versus tablets with cholestyramine (P < .005). The results confirm (1) bioequivalence of 0.20 mg capsules versus 0.25 mg tablets, (2) significant alterations in tablet bioavailability due to cholestyramine and propantheline, and (3) reduction of these alterations by the capsule dosage form. These findings suggest that digoxin capsules may offer clinical advantages over digoxin tablets in achieving predictable, consistent serum digoxin concentrations in patients receiving cholestyramine, propantheline, and similar drugs.This publication has 12 references indexed in Scilit:
- Simultaneous Statistical InferencePublished by Springer Nature ,1981
- Drug Interactions with DigoxinDrugs, 1980
- Decreased bioavailability of digoxin due to hypocholesterolemic interventions.Circulation, 1978
- Decreased Bioavailability of Digoxin Due to Antacids and Kaolin-PectinNew England Journal of Medicine, 1976
- Digoxin bioavailability: Formulations and rates of infusionsClinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics, 1976
- A completely absorbed oral preparation of digoxinClinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics, 1976
- Maximal intestinal absorption of digoxin, and its relation to steady state plasma concentration.Heart, 1975
- Absorption of digoxin from different oral preparations in normal subjects during steady stateClinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics, 1974
- ALTERED ABSORPTION OF DIGOXIN IN PATIENTS GIVEN PROPANTHELINE AND METOCLOPRAMIDEThe Lancet, 1973
- On the Evaluation of Biologic Availability of Digoxin from TabletsDrug Intelligence & Clinical Pharmacy, 1973